RoverAndOut 4,746 Posted December 24, 2021 20 minutes ago, Windsor said: Nicely timed release. The nationalists on the outskirts of my family tree were telling folk that Prince Charles was doing the speech this year. He was going it, they said, because the Queen was already dead and the government were trying to cover up that fact to prevent gatherings of grief stricken subjects. She is looking remarkably well for a dead woman in that picture, although I’m sure they will now be convinced it’s CGI. Stupid nationalist fucks. You're not related to The Old Crem are you?! 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
openviews 334 Posted December 24, 2021 2020 speech for comparison. https://youtu.be/OZbCRN3C_Hs Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Windsor 2,233 Posted December 25, 2021 When are we going to start an abdication sweep stake? I’ve always thought that her comments on the matter have perhaps been taken too literally. One could argue that she has already served her whole life. Abdicating at 95 after a 70 year reign is also a whole different kettle of fish to abdicating after 11 months for some tart… 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ladyfiona 2,585 Posted December 25, 2021 If it were to happen it would be after June next year. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fergie86 376 Posted December 25, 2021 1 minute ago, ladyfiona said: If it were to happen it would be after June next year. Will almost certainly start to see less and less of her from next June, after the Jubilee I think she will reduce her public appearances significantly, don’t think she will ever abdicate as she isn’t the type but Charles, William and rest of Royal family will take on more responsibility. The Queen is 96 next year and that will be the same age as Prince Phillip was when he retired from Public appearances, after 70 years on throne makes sense she slows down a bit. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
roaming_comrade 471 Posted December 25, 2021 2 hours ago, Windsor said: When are we going to start an abdication sweep stake? I’ve always thought that her comments on the matter have perhaps been taken too literally. One could argue that she has already served her whole life. Abdicating at 95 after a 70 year reign is also a whole different kettle of fish to abdicating after 11 months for some tart… If she reaches age 98 but doesnt beat the Reign duration record of French King Louis the ca. 10-15th, then I'll eat my chair Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Neol Edmunds 78 Posted December 25, 2021 9 minutes ago, roaming_comrade said: If she reaches age 98 but doesnt beat the Reign duration record of French King Louis the ca. 10-15th, then I'll eat my chair Louis XIV iirc 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Donald 182 Posted December 25, 2021 7 hours ago, Windsor said: When are we going to start an abdication sweep stake? I’ve always thought that her comments on the matter have perhaps been taken too literally. One could argue that she has already served her whole life. Abdicating at 95 after a 70 year reign is also a whole different kettle of fish to abdicating after 11 months for some tart… I had started a similar topic here Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Arsewipe 202 Posted December 26, 2021 I think she'll abdicate the day after reaching her ton, if she lives that long. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Toast 16,140 Posted December 26, 2021 There's really no point in abdication at this stage. If she had wanted to do it in order to let Charles succeed at a younger age, she would have done it years ago. 7 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DCI Frank Burnside 3,887 Posted December 26, 2021 A good chunk of things are done by Charles now anyway. 5 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dodrade 94 Posted December 26, 2021 On 25/12/2021 at 14:33, Windsor said: When are we going to start an abdication sweep stake? I’ve always thought that her comments on the matter have perhaps been taken too literally. One could argue that she has already served her whole life. Abdicating at 95 after a 70 year reign is also a whole different kettle of fish to abdicating after 11 months for some tart… She said "whole life" and meant it. The trauma of the abdication crisis and subsequent burden put on her father (which the Queen Mother partly blamed for his early death) set her implacably against the idea. She is also a devout Christian and would not countenance breaking her vow or coronation oath. 4 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Windsor 2,233 Posted December 26, 2021 7 minutes ago, dodrade said: She said "whole life" and meant it. The trauma of the abdication crisis and subsequent burden put on her father (which the Queen Mother partly blamed for his early death) set her implacably against the idea. She is also a devout Christian and would not countenance breaking her vow or coronation oath. There would be no trauma in a 95 year old retiring. When she made that vow she probably thought 85 would be a good innings. It is literally impossible for her abdication to cause her successor an early death, given he has been drawing his pension for near on a decade. As a devout Christian she may take the view that God may release her from her vow without killing her off. If the good lord makes it impossible for her to do the job without necessarily killing her, she may see that as a sign. Even the Duke of Edinburgh retired, and he similarly promised to serve the Queen for his whole life before God. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RoverAndOut 4,746 Posted December 26, 2021 I do think there is a case for her to step down at some point post-jubilee, not just due to her advancing age, but also to help the transition. I'm increasingly suspecting that the post-Elizabethan period is going to be difficult for The Firm, what with Andrew's alleged misdemeanours and the Harry and Meghan fallout (which directly relates to Charles as his father). Having Charles take over before the Queen's death means she is still around to play a role and usher in the new era - she's still a hugely popular member of the family and arguably keeping the show on the road at the moment. But I don't think it's a given she abdicates, particularly if she remains sharp and mobile. Guess we'll wait and see. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Windsor 2,233 Posted December 26, 2021 59 minutes ago, RoverAndOut said: I do think there is a case for her to step down at some point post-jubilee, not just due to her advancing age, but also to help the transition. I'm increasingly suspecting that the post-Elizabethan period is going to be difficult for The Firm, what with Andrew's alleged misdemeanours and the Harry and Meghan fallout (which directly relates to Charles as his father). Having Charles take over before the Queen's death means she is still around to play a role and usher in the new era - she's still a hugely popular member of the family and arguably keeping the show on the road at the moment. But I don't think it's a given she abdicates, particularly if she remains sharp and mobile. Guess we'll wait and see. By all accounts Charles thinks Andrew is a cock. I’d bet he’d be willing to throw him under a bus with the whole Epstein thing, something his mother won’t do, to her detriment. If she doesn’t abdicate she should at least do the decent thing and instruct Parliament to enact the regency act. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Old Crem 3,605 Posted December 26, 2021 2 minutes ago, Windsor said: By all accounts Charles thinks Andrew is a cock. I’d bet he’d be willing to throw him under a bus with the whole Epstein thing, something his mother won’t do, to her detriment. If she doesn’t abdicate she should at least do the decent thing and instruct Parliament to enact the regency act. I think the regency act is only needed if she is no longer mentally capable of the few legal duties she has. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Old Crem 3,605 Posted December 26, 2021 Just finally watched the message in full and to me she looks notably thinner and aged compared to the clips from the G20 summit in June. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RoverAndOut 4,746 Posted December 26, 2021 1 hour ago, The Old Crem said: Just finally watched the message in full and to me she looks notably thinner and aged compared to the clips from the G20 summit in June. Yeah, well, Stage IV terminal cancer tends to have that effect doesn't it? 2 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
chiesa52 132 Posted December 27, 2021 She is thinner because she is grieving for Philip. When people are married that long, it's very common for the surviving spouse to go downhill- keep an eye on anniversaries, such as the anniversary of Philip's death, or his birthday, or even the death of George VI- those are times when surviving spouses often die. She is a tough lady though, and still as sharp as a tack- she could be in there for some time to come, maybe years- but she is on my list for next year- it will be a very sad day when she dies though 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SleepSerenity 13 Posted December 29, 2021 On 25/12/2021 at 16:35, ladyfiona said: If it were to happen it would be after June next year. After we get that extra bank holiday if possible Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Donald 182 Posted December 29, 2021 Queen Elizabeth and Queen Mother at ~95 years and 8 months The Queen Mother at Sandown, London. 26 March 1996 The Queen's Christmas Message 2021 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Windsor 2,233 Posted December 30, 2021 29 minutes ago, Donald said: Queen Elizabeth and Queen Mother at ~95 years and 8 months The Queen Mother at Sandown, London. 26 March 1996 The Queen's Christmas Message 2021 Babes. 1 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
WinterCake 41 Posted December 30, 2021 one to put on for 2022- disappeared alot from public, looks like cgi on her christmas message. Seems like something is being hidden. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MrWonderful 481 Posted December 30, 2021 Damn it, I'm going to put her on my list now after saying I wasn't going to just 5 minutes ago. She does look noticeably thinner, I have to agree. Damn. I've long admired the Queen. Long may she reign! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lafaucheuse 4,051 Posted December 30, 2021 I don’t think she looks that frail honestly. She looks thinner than other years maybe but honestly she looks quite healthy for a soon-to-be-96-yo-woman ! The only thing I would say is she’s seems a tad tired but nothing to worry about imo Share this post Link to post Share on other sites