Jump to content
Paul Bearer

Prince Andrew

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, YoungWillz said:

Returns military affiliations and Royal patronages to the Queen. (BBC News Channel Live).


With the Queen’s approval and agreement. 
 

it’ll be the honorary military ranks now, if he loses the case it’ll be his honours and medals possibly. Even though it’s only a civil case. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, YoungWillz said:

Returns military affiliations and Royal patronages to the Queen. (BBC News Channel Live).

Going to be some who won’t get a replacement royal ad there is simply not enough working Royals left and I don’t think Charles wants to give anything even to Anne or Edward. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

According the the BBC he has also lost his HRH status.

 

The Queen has essentially done to Andrew what she did to Prince Harry. He's out.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Windsor said:

According the the BBC he has also lost his HRH status.

 

Do you need to reename the thread as "Andrew" then ?

 

Or the royal formaly known as Prince Anderw

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Shall we just call this thread “Andrew” now?!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Dead Wait said:

Shall we just call this thread “Andrew” now?!

Or duke of York. Apparently thar will be his title.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, RIP Wee Jum said:

 

Do you need to reename the thread as "Andrew" then ?

 

Or the royal formaly known as Prince Anderw

 

Na he's still a prince. Just not a Royal Highness. A His Royal Lowlife?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Windsor said:

 

Na he's still a prince. Just not a Royal Highness. A His Royal Lowlife?

On official forms (like the statement released) he will simply be called the Duke of York. 
I wonder if his daughters will remain HRH? 
 

I wonder if more is coming out soon and the Queen has decided to act fast before it does. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, The Old Crem said:

On official forms (like the statement released) he will simply be called the Duke of York. 
I wonder if his daughters will remain HRH? 
 

I wonder if more is coming out soon and the Queen has decided to act fast before it does. 

 

Its a shame she can't still sack Prime Ministers.

 

But then even she would need to wait for (soon to be Baroness) Sue Gray to clarify whether or not it was a party. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 hours ago, Windsor said:

But then even she would need to wait for (soon to be Baroness) Sue Gray to clarify whether or not it was a party. 

 

The way we're all being told to wait for this enquiry strongly suggests that it's already been fixed in the Government's  favour.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

aZrL3Dz_460swp.webp

 

 

271957097_134595385692868_57648366696986

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 8

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I still can't agree that shagging a 17 year old makes someone a paedophile.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

D316E104-238A-4251-B92C-406D73981BAC.jpeg.3ba2a10abe295187e18111c2d7e658b8.jpeg

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
54 minutes ago, Toast said:

I still can't agree that shagging a 17 year old makes someone a paedophile.

It doesn't.

It just makes good headlines and it stirs up the public like nothing else can.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, Lord Fellatio Nelson said:

It doesn't.

It just makes good headlines and it stirs up the public like nothing else can.

 

 

It impoverishes our language, as it leaves us with no specific word for those who sexually violate babies and young children.

Like this creature.   There's a huge difference.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Boomer comedy is strong on this thread. Jim Davidson must be shitting himself.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Andrew Muttley.jpg

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, En Passant said:

Andrew Muttley.jpg

 

 

Bit harsh on Muttley, mind!

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
36 minutes ago, maryportfuncity said:

 

 

Bit harsh on Muttley, mind!

 

37 minutes ago, maryportfuncity said:

 

 

Bit harsh on Muttley, mind!

Muttley or Big Dog?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's Muttley,  the joke relies on it being him I'm afraid.

You probably need to be of a certain age, I don't suppose it's shown much any more in a world of sponge bob and so on, dno <shrug>?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In groundbreaking evidence that’ll totally prove that Prince Andrew is innocent, his lawyers claim that the accusers has false memories of their allegations :facepalm:

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Joey Russ said:

In groundbreaking evidence that’ll totally prove that Prince Andrew is innocent, his lawyers claim that the accusers has false memories of their allegations :facepalm:

 

 

Another highly dodgy strategy - it's true abuse victims can have memory distortion but if this does end up in court he's struggling to prove she mistook him for someone else and her memories may well be pitted alongside flight logs from Epstein's "Lolita Express" aircraft and the records of Andrew's staff and other official sources, like diplomatic records from the US when Andrew was on his trade missions. 

 

Surely, the scramble is already on amongst British thesps for the lead in the first television adaptation - i think Johnny Vegas offers the requisite gravitas,  would be ideal and would scrub up to sweaty noncedom with minimal make up. 

 

Jvegas.jpg

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×

Important Information

Your use of this forum is subject to our Terms of Use