Terrorists & Topical Terrorist Targets

[The Mad Hatter 1,092]

Watch channel 4 news reports are coming in of people running and shooting nothing has been confirmed https://mobile.twitter.com/search?q=Paris&s=typd

[Weebl 216]

 

You can't really solve the problem of terrorism when you have an effectively infinite supply of these nutters willing to blow themselves up for the cause. You can't ban an idea.

 

The only way to really solve Islamic terrorism in the West would be to have a racist state that excluded all Halibuts. But no one's really willing to do that because multiculturalism is a sacred cow.

 

People die because of the effects of multiculturalism, yet it's not socially acceptable to suggest that letting millions of Halibuts and other third worlders into the West might not have been a good idea.

 

Anyway, the world would definitely be a better place not just without Islam, not just without the Abrahamic religions, but without religion in general.

Remember you do have a finite number of nutters. Just a question about size. It may feel like an infinite number but each and every one of us is an individual who has the sum number of beliefs. Now you pose the idea of having a racist state that excludes all Halibuts?

I ask you. Would it not be easier, to allow for fundermentalists to be allowed a "state" of their own that excludes all those who do not believe in such nonsense, so that they can do whatever they want and not be allowed to trouble everyone else?

 

Round them up, put them in a (field) high walled, half distroyed city in Syria, and... If they don't behave... (Bomb the bastards)

 

 

It wouldn't work in practice...

 

The bleeding heart liberals have basically fucked up everything in the West. As soon as you suggest tackling the source of a problem like this, you get called a racist. So there's no point in even engaging with the cunts

[Spade_Cooley 9,525]

So you're basically saying you're too much of a pussy to argue with a 65-year-old bearded sandals-wearing redbrick uni lecturer?

[Weebl 216]

So you're basically saying you're too much of a pussy to argue with a 65-year-old bearded sandals-wearing redbrick uni lecturer?

 

Something like that. At the end of the day, there's more support amongst the public for left wing policies than there is for right wing ones. Look at Jeremy Corbyn for example, he got voted Labour leader and lots of people love him

[Lord Fellatio Nelson 6,218]

 

So you're basically saying you're too much of a pussy to argue with a 65-year-old bearded sandals-wearing redbrick uni lecturer?

 

Something like that. At the end of the day, there's more support amongst the public for left wing policies than there is for right wing ones. Look at Jeremy Corbyn for example, he got voted Labour leader and lots of people love him

 

Well, you know how it is.

We do love a well to do middle class lentil eating cunt, who has barely worked a single day in his life, leading the country ahead of an old Etonian, eh.

[Weebl 216]

Or look at the SNP in Scotland. Totally left wing there and there's no appetite in Scotland for any right-wing policies at all.

 

So left wing socialists will be all lovey dovey towards Halibuts and immigrants, and as soon as anyone decides to grow a pair and suggests some masculine, nationalistic ideas, they basically get called a fascist and told to fuck off.

 

The West is doomed because its politicians are a bunch of complete pussies. Masculine men aren't even represented in politics.

[maryportfuncity 10,646]

So

 

Will Abdeslam Salah be a startline contender for various dead pools in 2016. I'm reckoning they might just take him alive.

 

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-34826117

[Weebl 216]

 

 

So you're basically saying you're too much of a pussy to argue with a 65-year-old bearded sandals-wearing redbrick uni lecturer?

 

Something like that. At the end of the day, there's more support amongst the public for left wing policies than there is for right wing ones. Look at Jeremy Corbyn for example, he got voted Labour leader and lots of people love him

 

Well, you know how it is.

We do love a well to do middle class lentil eating cunt, who has barely worked a single day in his life, leading the country ahead of an old Etonian, eh.

 

 

Funny how the Labour party started as the party of working people (i.e. labour, as in work) and ended up being the party of choice for benefits scroungers (i.e. those who don't work). The irony

[The Mad Hatter 1,092]

 

 

 

So you're basically saying you're too much of a pussy to argue with a 65-year-old bearded sandals-wearing redbrick uni lecturer?

 

Something like that. At the end of the day, there's more support amongst the public for left wing policies than there is for right wing ones. Look at Jeremy Corbyn for example, he got voted Labour leader and lots of people love him

Well, you know how it is.

We do love a well to do middle class lentil eating cunt, who has barely worked a single day in his life, leading the country ahead of an old Etonian, eh.

Funny how the Labour party started as the party of working people (i.e. labour, as in work) and ended up being the party of choice for benefits scroungers (i.e. those who don't work). The irony

which party would you vote for?

[rockhopper penguin 2,265]

 

 

 

 

So you're basically saying you're too much of a pussy to argue with a 65-year-old bearded sandals-wearing redbrick uni lecturer?

Something like that. At the end of the day, there's more support amongst the public for left wing policies than there is for right wing ones. Look at Jeremy Corbyn for example, he got voted Labour leader and lots of people love him

Well, you know how it is.

We do love a well to do middle class lentil eating cunt, who has barely worked a single day in his life, leading the country ahead of an old Etonian, eh.

Funny how the Labour party started as the party of working people (i.e. labour, as in work) and ended up being the party of choice for benefits scroungers (i.e. those who don't work). The irony

which party would you vote for?

 

 

 

 

 

So you're basically saying you're too much of a pussy to argue with a 65-year-old bearded sandals-wearing redbrick uni lecturer?

 

Something like that. At the end of the day, there's more support amongst the public for left wing policies than there is for right wing ones. Look at Jeremy Corbyn for example, he got voted Labour leader and lots of people love him

 

Well, you know how it is.

We do love a well to do middle class lentil eating cunt, who has barely worked a single day in his life, leading the country ahead of an old Etonian, eh.

 

 

Funny how the Labour party started as the party of working people (i.e. labour, as in work) and ended up being the party of choice for benefits scroungers (i.e. those who don't work). The irony

 

Why would a political party seek to attract the votes of so few people? There are around 5 million people on benefits (I'm assuming you don't believe people on tax credits and pensions are scroungers - but I could be wrong). The Government estimates that less 1% are claimant fraudulently (scrounging). Let's keep it at 1% so this is simple enough for you to follow - that means 50,000 people scrounging. Hardly going to win an election is it? Unless of course you believe everyone on benefits is a scrounger - which is an insult to anyone who lost a job through no fault of their own (an increasingly common effect due to employment law changes) or is disabled (but presumably you believe in euthanasia anyway). But even then, having a guaranteed 5 million votes spread around mainly urban and northern areas isn't going to win you an election either.

Here's a link to a definition of socialism which might also help you http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/socialismIt's from a children's website so you should be able to understand it.

[Weebl 216]

 

 

 

 

So you're basically saying you're too much of a pussy to argue with a 65-year-old bearded sandals-wearing redbrick uni lecturer?

Something like that. At the end of the day, there's more support amongst the public for left wing policies than there is for right wing ones. Look at Jeremy Corbyn for example, he got voted Labour leader and lots of people love him

Well, you know how it is.

We do love a well to do middle class lentil eating cunt, who has barely worked a single day in his life, leading the country ahead of an old Etonian, eh.

Funny how the Labour party started as the party of working people (i.e. labour, as in work) and ended up being the party of choice for benefits scroungers (i.e. those who don't work). The irony

which party would you vote for?

 

 

I wouldn't even bother. Complete waste of time.

[Sir Creep 7,070]

 

 

 

 

 

So you're basically saying you're too much of a pussy to argue with a 65-year-old bearded sandals-wearing redbrick uni lecturer?

 

Something like that. At the end of the day, there's more support amongst the public for left wing policies than there is for right wing ones. Look at Jeremy Corbyn for example, he got voted Labour leader and lots of people love him

Well, you know how it is.

We do love a well to do middle class lentil eating cunt, who has barely worked a single day in his life, leading the country ahead of an old Etonian, eh.

Funny how the Labour party started as the party of working people (i.e. labour, as in work) and ended up being the party of choice for benefits scroungers (i.e. those who don't work). The irony

which party would you vote for?

I wouldn't even bother. Complete waste of time.

So is bitching about the results thereafter.

SC

[Cat O'Falk 3,290]

First past the post works only in two party politics (and not always); it's about time it was scrapped in a multi-party society. 37% of the vote and 100% of the power isn't right.

 

Force the buggers to work together instead of against each other.

 

Germany is hardly the sick man of Europe; I can't be arsed to look it up but does anyone know how many coalition governments out of how many they've had since the end of WWII?

[Dr. Zorders 1,271]

So you're basically saying you're too much of a pussy to argue with a 65-year-old bearded sandals-wearing redbrick uni lecturer?

Ehrm...yes... because they're the only, or most significant people who..............

 

 

 

 

[rockhopper penguin 2,265]

First past the post works only in two party politics (and not always); it's about time it was scrapped in a multi-party society. 37% of the vote and 100% of the power isn't right.

 

Force the buggers to work together instead of against each other.

 

Germany is hardly the sick man of Europe; I can't be arsed to look it up but does anyone know how many coalition governments out of how many they've had since the end of WWII?

Only one election with an outright winner since Hitler. That was in 1957.

Ooh and that's my 500th post.

[Cat O'Falk 3,290]

 

First past the post works only in two party politics (and not always); it's about time it was scrapped in a multi-party society. 37% of the vote and 100% of the power isn't right.

 

Force the buggers to work together instead of against each other.

 

Germany is hardly the sick man of Europe; I can't be arsed to look it up but does anyone know how many coalition governments out of how many they've had since the end of WWII?

Only one election with an outright winner since Hitler. That was in 1957.

Ooh and that's my 500th post.

 

Congratulations!

[Paul Bearer 6,102]

France dropping bombs on ISIS strongholds now. The fun begins.

[Deathray 2,940]

France dropping bombs on ISIS strongholds now. The fun begins.

 

Yep, 'cos that's going to stop the guys already in Europe preparing to blow shit up! Why do we never learn!

[The Mad Hatter 1,092]

 

France dropping bombs on ISIS strongholds now. The fun begins.

 

Yep, 'cos that's going to stop the guys already in Europe preparing to blow shit up! Why do we never learn!

war is very profitable for some nations have you ever heard of war profiteering.

[Phantom 2,533]

 

France dropping bombs on ISIS strongholds now. The fun begins.

 

Yep, 'cos that's going to stop the guys already in Europe preparing to blow shit up! Why do we never learn!

 

 

It's to satisfy those that want the deaths to be avenged. It's not going to stop this that are already on the move in Europe, but it's a display of strength for the French forces.

[GossipGabe 333]

 

 

France dropping bombs on ISIS strongholds now. The fun begins.

 

Yep, 'cos that's going to stop the guys already in Europe preparing to blow shit up! Why do we never learn!

It's to satisfy those that want the deaths to be avenged. It's not going to stop this that are already on the move in Europe, but it's a display of strength for the French forces.

It's a bit akin to the Americans' reaction after 9/11. The American public wanted blood, and they got it, both Afghan and Iraqi blood and American blood. The US could topple the Taliban, could kill Zarqawi, Bin Laden (although it took almost 10 years) and even marginalized Al Qaeda; only to be replaced by ISIS, which is more ruthless and barbaric than it's "predecessor" ever was or dreamt to be.

[charon 4,943]

 

 

Was it him, with a cheeky wee wink on the way past?

 

 

[The Mad Hatter 1,092]

France dropping bombs on ISIS strongholds now. The fun begins.

I heard the bombs had "with love from Paris" written on them.

[Deathray 2,940]

Was it him, with a cheeky wee wink on the way past?

 

 

 

Lets not do this again -

http://gawker.com/reddit-apologizes-for-leading-boston-bomber-witch-hunt-477141847

[The Mad Hatter 1,092]

 

Was it him, with a cheeky wee wink on the way past?

 

Lets not do this again -

http://gawker.com/reddit-apologizes-for-leading-boston-bomber-witch-hunt-477141847

it's just a forum with 6 people not much of a manhunt.