Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 14/03/21 in all areas
-
5 pointsOkay, okay, so which one of us is going to own up to being Sir Malcolm Richteabiscuit?
-
4 pointsMurray Walker was an obvious choice by almost everyone: 14:22, Annami, Bibliogryphon, Book, Buffalo Phil, CaptainChorizo, chilean way, Elephant, Etushispushingupdaisies, gcreptile, Great Uncle Bulgaria, Joey Russ, msc, Prophet, RoverAndOut, The Daredevil, The Old Crem,The Quim Reaper, ThereWillBeDeaths7, TomTomTelekom, Vaagheid, WEP and the Committee, of course.
-
3 pointsSome absolute classics https://www.eurosport.co.uk/formula-1/funniest-ever-murrayisms-a-tribute-to-the-marvellous-murray-walker_sto4739312/story "The lead car is absolutely unique, except for the one behind it which is identical."
-
2 points
-
1 pointA few suggestions of a few elderly political spouses of "the great & the good" 1) Winnie Mandela, 79 2) Rosalynn Carter, 88 3) Barbara Bush, 90 4) Bernadette Chirac, 82 5) Anne-Aymone Giscard d'Estaing 82 6) Naina Yeltsin 83
-
1 point...cough... well in my opinion, Skyfall goes there.... Also, it has to be said, gay spies were very common in the cold war era. People without family attachments and able to be blackmailed, always subliminally subversive. For example here (I just checked for a short article): https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-35360172 Bruce Glover, the actor listed above, however, is the father of prominent actor Crispin Glover.
-
1 point
-
1 pointOldest living person in Canada gets COVID-19 vaccine. Phyllis Ridgway, a British-born Canadian, is 114-years-old and the 14th oldest validated person in the world. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/canadas-oldest-person-vaccine-1.5949168
-
1 pointI note the police are being criticised for being heavy handed in breaking up the Sarah Everard vigil. Personally I think the whole thing is a load of bollocks. While I am sure there will have been genuine ‘survivors’, I noticed most of the noise was coming from women who gave themselves an equal victim status to Sarah Everard because they had been wolf-whistled at on occasion in the street. Sarah Everard was a victim of murder. Not of a Wolf-whistle. Listened to one of them on the news who explained that, as a man, if I see a woman walking on one side of the road in the dark that I should cross to the other side so she doesn’t feel threatened. The same woman said that as a man if I am walking at night I shouldn’t walk bristly as that can cause alarm. Here’s an idea: she can stay inside after dark, the arsehole! Regarding the vigil. I believe all vigils, except for those involving close family, to be an absolute waste of time. They achieve nothing and only serve to allow most of the attendees to draw attention to themselves. There’s no place for them in lockdown.
-
1 pointI don't he think he was quite as sharp in his last couple of years of F1, which is why I was surprised he lasted so long afterwards. His best years I think were with James Hunt.
-
1 point
-
1 pointIain has been busy tonight. Cecilia Bartholemew @CeciliaBTory · 1m If #CressidadIck resigned SHE WOULD PROBABLY BE REPLACED BY A MAN. HOW WOULD THAT HELP WOMENS SAFETY????? #ClaphamCommon #police
-
1 pointNah he isn’t, cos this ‘talk’ is designed purely to wind like-minded people up. It’s fiction, there in an attempt to defame and ridicule those who do just want a better, less discriminatory society. The reason it sound like it’s nonsense is because, well, it fucking is. I bet absolutely nothing will come of it other than a few red faces.
-
1 pointOn another note, I'm really disturbed by the current attitude towards women and their vulnerability. I can still hear from my youth the voice of my mum with the litany "Don't walk home on your own! Don't have too much to drink! Keep your wits about you! etc " But nowadays it seems to me that a generation of girls is being indoctrinated with the opposite. They are ENTITLED to get as pissed as they like, ENTITLED to dress like whores, ENTITLED to walk home alone in the dark. Anyone who suggests that they might be making themselves vulnerable is firmly told that they are ENTITLED to please themselves. In a perfect world there would be no bad people who would attack, mug, rape, kill. But it isn't a perfect world, and there will always be people like that whether we like it or not. So the advice, especially to young women, should be to take responsibility for themselves, reduce risk and don't render yourself vulnerable. But if you dare to suggest that someone has contributed to their own misfortune by reckless behaviour, you are immediately accused of: "VICTIM BLAMING" I really despair. I think it is totally irresponsible to instil this mindset in young people. It enables the predators.
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
1 pointChris Wilder sacked by Sheffield United. I think this is ungrateful and I think he would have been ideally placed to challenge for promotion in the Championship. No-one will save them from relegation now
-
1 pointThey tried Canada first. Expected the Canadians to pay for their security but were told to piss off with that.
-
1 pointYeah and telling us how tough they have it from their mansion while people all over the world are dying on their own separated from loved ones and in financial turmoil. Yeah I hear race relations are pretty idyllic in the states which is why they went.
-
1 pointThe biggest problem I have with the vain self-obsessed pair is that by being so vague they simultaneously have trashed the entire royal family by association yet haven`t given any details anyone can dispute or investigate.I couldn`t find any claim they made that anyone could investigate. What is the palace supposed to do? If they say they can`t investigate which they can`t really as it is so vague as we don`t know who said what where or why they will be called stuffy out of touch heartless and racist.If someone came to me at work and told me I am alledging X Y and Z happen but won`t tell you where when or whom it occurred I would have to say truthfully if that is the case I can`t do anything. I only watched it as everyone was talking about it. It looked very stage managed rehearsed and not overly convincing and it was much to do about nothing in terms of substance. If you can`t name people who have wronged you don`t bother speaking out. They wanted it vague so there could be no repercussions except revenge via reputational damage to the institution. That is the only conclusion I can deduce. They must have known this would seriously hurt the Queen and other senior royals on quite a deep emotional level at a time when old Phil is clearly getting towards the end. What I find most telling is that this is a bigger scandal than Prince Andrew which beggars belief considering the seriousness of the allegations against him and the fact far more is documented and known about the circumstances surrounding that saga.
-
1 pointI was never overly fussed about them or the Royal Family, If I'm honest. Now, however, I am fucking angry that they have hung us all out to dry with this notion that they have left the UK because we are racist ( yeah, like we ALL are) to live in a country that is less racist, obviously. Apart from that, she has social climbed like a fucking champ and got married to a fucking chump that thinks the mental anguish he suffered following his mums coffin through London was unique to him and not his brother. This country has its faults, lots of them but anybody that wants to trash it, like they did, and our Royal Family, OUR Royal Family, needs a swift kick in the cunt and banned from setting foot here ever again. A pair of self serving, handwringing bastards of the highest order interviewed by a journalist so piss poor that only America could have made her a multi millionaire shit show. I'm going to find a cat to kick.
-
1 pointIt's hard to express the depth of my contempt for this loathsome pair.
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
Newsletter
Important Information
Your use of this forum is subject to our Terms of Use