DevonDeathTrip 2,360 Posted August 25, 2016 Self-service tills. I spent too much valuable time paffing about in Morrisons earlier trying to pay for about five items. For unknown reasons the (bloody annoying) voice from the machine instructed me to wait for assistance, which took forever to arrive as the harassed assistant in question was trying to help every other hapless victim of the crap technology. My understanding of shoplifting law is that you are guilty of the offence if you leave the store with goods and without offering payment. Therefore I can't help wondering if I would be within my legal rights to just walk out with my shopping and use the defence that I was offering payment, but Morrisons are seemingly incapable of accepting it? 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Handrejka 1,904 Posted August 25, 2016 Self-service tills. I spent too much valuable time paffing about in Morrisons earlier trying to pay for about five items. For unknown reasons the (bloody annoying) voice from the machine instructed me to wait for assistance, which took forever to arrive as the harassed assistant in question was trying to help every other hapless victim of the crap technology. My understanding of shoplifting law is that you are guilty of the offence if you leave the store with goods and without offering payment. Therefore I can't help wondering if I would be within my legal rights to just walk out with my shopping and use the defence that I was offering payment, but Morrisons are seemingly incapable of accepting it? Funnily enough this happened to me yesterday. My card was declined twice at the self service till. The second time it happened I hadn't realised and walked off. The assistants are quick enough then let me tell you. They marched me back to the till and watched me pay, could have been worse though I guess. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
time 8,645 Posted August 26, 2016 Self-service tills. I spent too much valuable time paffing about in Morrisons earlier trying to pay for about five items. For unknown reasons the (bloody annoying) voice from the machine instructed me to wait for assistance, which took forever to arrive as the harassed assistant in question was trying to help every other hapless victim of the crap technology. My understanding of shoplifting law is that you are guilty of the offence if you leave the store with goods and without offering payment. Therefore I can't help wondering if I would be within my legal rights to just walk out with my shopping and use the defence that I was offering payment, but Morrisons are seemingly incapable of accepting it? Agreed. See also my post from a few years ago! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Deathray 2,941 Posted August 26, 2016 Self-service tills. I spent too much valuable time paffing about in Morrisons earlier trying to pay for about five items. For unknown reasons the (bloody annoying) voice from the machine instructed me to wait for assistance, which took forever to arrive as the harassed assistant in question was trying to help every other hapless victim of the crap technology. My understanding of shoplifting law is that you are guilty of the offence if you leave the store with goods and without offering payment. Therefore I can't help wondering if I would be within my legal rights to just walk out with my shopping and use the defence that I was offering payment, but Morrisons are seemingly incapable of accepting it? Agreed. See also my post from a few years ago! This would only be viable if absolutely no counters that are manned were open. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Toast 16,170 Posted August 27, 2016 I like the scan-as-you-go ones, where I arrive at the checkout with everything already packed at my leisure, and all I have to do is pay. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bibliogryphon 9,597 Posted August 30, 2016 For those of you in the US who are looking forward to the latest series of Dancing with the Stars it looks like Vanilla Ice will be taking part. He has certainly been a frequent DDP pick in years gone by so we look forward to updates that he has put all that bad living behind him. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Youwanticewiththat 611 Posted August 31, 2016 For those of you in the US who are looking forward to the latest series of Dancing with the Stars it looks like Vanilla Ice will be taking part. He has certainly been a frequent DDP pick in years gone by so we look forward to updates that he has put all that bad living behind him. Liking a little joke (part II).. that's when The Reaper starts honing his scythe. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Toast 16,170 Posted September 3, 2016 Twats who insist on answering forum posts when they can't help. I've asked on a genealogy forum if someone can look up a marriage for me in a parish register or another resource. I said it's not in the GRO index, and may have been left off through a clerical error (there are plenty of examples of this). I said there's no reason why the two parties wouldn't have married (no previous marriages, over 21, respectable backgrounds etc) Some fool replies that he can't find it in the GRO index. And it's his opinion that no marriage took place. It's particularly annoying because I posted this on the appropriate county page, where there are likely to be folk who have access to the PRs. It's specialist. But the forum is infested with these do-gooder types who try and answer everything. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
charon 4,943 Posted September 3, 2016 Twats who insist on answering forum posts when they can't help. I've asked on a genealogy forum if someone can look up a marriage for me in a parish register or another resource. I said it's not in the GRO index, and may have been left off through a clerical error (there are plenty of examples of this). I said there's no reason why the two parties wouldn't have married (no previous marriages, over 21, respectable backgrounds etc) Some fool replies that he can't find it in the GRO index. And it's his opinion that no marriage took place. It's particularly annoying because I posted this on the appropriate county page, where there are likely to be folk who have access to the PRs. It's specialist. But the forum is infested with these do-gooder types who try and answer everything. Sorry, ain't got a clue about that shit. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Toast 16,170 Posted September 3, 2016 Twats who insist on answering forum posts when they can't help. I've asked on a genealogy forum if someone can look up a marriage for me in a parish register or another resource. I said it's not in the GRO index, and may have been left off through a clerical error (there are plenty of examples of this). I said there's no reason why the two parties wouldn't have married (no previous marriages, over 21, respectable backgrounds etc) Some fool replies that he can't find it in the GRO index. And it's his opinion that no marriage took place. It's particularly annoying because I posted this on the appropriate county page, where there are likely to be folk who have access to the PRs. It's specialist. But the forum is infested with these do-gooder types who try and answer everything. Sorry, ain't got a clue about that shit. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CarolAnn 926 Posted September 5, 2016 Twats who insist on answering forum posts when they can't help. I've asked on a genealogy forum if someone can look up a marriage for me in a parish register or another resource. I said it's not in the GRO index, and may have been left off through a clerical error (there are plenty of examples of this). I said there's no reason why the two parties wouldn't have married (no previous marriages, over 21, respectable backgrounds etc) Some fool replies that he can't find it in the GRO index. And it's his opinion that no marriage took place. It's particularly annoying because I posted this on the appropriate county page, where there are likely to be folk who have access to the PRs. It's specialist. But the forum is infested with these do-gooder types who try and answer everything. My personal favorite is people who answer review questions on sites like Amazon with "Sorry, haven't tried it" or "Have no idea, don't have it." Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Paul Bearer 6,122 Posted September 5, 2016 My personal favorite is people who answer review questions on sites like Amazon with "Sorry, haven't tried it" or "Have no idea, don't have it." I left a similar message on Amazon. I was supposed to get something dilivered on the 1st, but still hasn't been delivered yet. I simply said I hadn't tried it yet as it hasn't been delivered. Was I wrong to do that? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Deathray 2,941 Posted September 5, 2016 You've heard the one about the Corrie archives before, haven't you? About how ITV are fucking sitting on the vast majority of them because they can't be arsed to do a bit of research (to sort out copyright issues) and a bit of transfer of medium work? (which they've probably already done for preservation reasons, if they've got ten brain cells between them). With the abysmally awful CS tonight, I'm starting to hope it gets cancelled so they actually start viewing the archives as a cash cow and make them available from the beginning. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
msc 18,491 Posted September 14, 2016 Kids! Well, not all kids. Specific kids. Specifically, the kids who decided to set the flat above us on fire last week. Long story short, I work from home (pays low but I get to spend time with the wean) which as just as well, as last Friday morning I could suddenly smell smoke. Went to check the front door - it's a close, there's usually someone burning toast - only to be face to face with a wall of smoke. I grabbed the wean, and darted outside, while the wife called 999. I then went back into try and get the neighbours (we've got newborns in the close) and got bloody smoke inhalation, but luckily the Polish lass with the newborn heard me and got out OK, and our neighbour on the top floor was actually trapped by the fire/smoke inhalation and the firemen had to save her. The smoke was apparently fucking toxic, so if I hadn't noticed something was up - wife was in, but she's got no sense of smell - her and the wean, not to mention the upstairs neighbour, would have been fucked. Scary to think about, really. Anyhow, I avoided getting chucked in the hospital to be monitored for "smoke inhalation" and our internet has now been fixed after the fire melted the fucking cables. Everyone - us, the wean, the other weans, and the neighbours dog - are all fine. But still, fucking kids. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Paul Bearer 6,122 Posted September 14, 2016 Kids! Well, not all kids. Specific kids. Specifically, the kids who decided to set the flat above us on fire last week. Long story short, I work from home (pays low but I get to spend time with the wean) which as just as well, as last Friday morning I could suddenly smell smoke. Went to check the front door - it's a close, there's usually someone burning toast - only to be face to face with a wall of smoke. I grabbed the wean, and darted outside, while the wife called 999. I then went back into try and get the neighbours (we've got newborns in the close) and got bloody smoke inhalation, but luckily the Polish lass with the newborn heard me and got out OK, and our neighbour on the top floor was actually trapped by the fire/smoke inhalation and the firemen had to save her. The smoke was apparently fucking toxic, so if I hadn't noticed something was up - wife was in, but she's got no sense of smell - her and the wean, not to mention the upstairs neighbour, would have been fucked. Scary to think about, really. Anyhow, I avoided getting chucked in the hospital to be monitored for "smoke inhalation" and our internet has now been fixed after the fire melted the fucking cables. Everyone - us, the wean, the other weans, and the neighbours dog - are all fine. But still, fucking kids. Wee bastards. Glad you're all ok. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
YoungWillz 21,086 Posted September 14, 2016 Good to hear you and the folks are fine. Why everyone doesn't live in detached manor houses in this, the fifth largest economy in the world, I don't know. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rockhopper penguin 2,265 Posted September 14, 2016 Good to hear you and the folks are fine. Why everyone doesn't live in detached manor houses in this, the fifth largest economy in the world, I don't know. Because the people in the detached Manor Houses have got all the money. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
msc 18,491 Posted September 14, 2016 Good to hear you and the folks are fine. Why everyone doesn't live in detached manor houses in this, the fifth largest economy in the world, I don't know. Saving up for one, just need to live another century or seven at the current economic growth rate. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Death Impends 8,011 Posted September 14, 2016 Yikes, little cretins. Glad everyone was unharmed. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Toast 16,170 Posted September 14, 2016 Just noticed that the swear filter f uckery extended to my signature. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cat O'Falk 3,290 Posted September 15, 2016 Just noticed that the swear filter f uckery extended to my signature. There is a solution but it seems no one wants to follow it through. https://forums.deathlist.net/topic/8967-warning-deathlist-downtime/page-2#entry275259 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
msc 18,491 Posted September 15, 2016 Just noticed that the swear filter f uckery extended to my signature. There is a solution but it seems no one wants to follow it through. https://forums.deathlist.net/topic/8967-warning-deathlist-downtime/page-2#entry275259 It can be changed by Admin, right? So that's three people: Paul, Magere (MIA) and Grim. As one of those is the on-site admin currently, and you posted that solution a while ago, and there has been no change, then one might surmise that the admin, as it were, are perfectly happy with the swear filter existing. The YouTube video thing is more annoying. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CarolAnn 926 Posted September 16, 2016 Kids! Well, not all kids. Specific kids. Specifically, the kids who decided to set the flat above us on fire last week. *snip* The smoke was apparently effing toxic... Meth lab? 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Deathray 2,941 Posted September 16, 2016 Got to love Student Finance. Spend half an hour on the phone to some dingbat and they can't resolve your problem. Ring back, speak to a different advisor and the issues resolved in less than a minute? 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bluejay 8 Posted September 16, 2016 Kids! Well, not all kids. Specific kids. Specifically, the kids who decided to set the flat above us on fire last week. Long story short, I work from home (pays low but I get to spend time with the wean) which as just as well, as last Friday morning I could suddenly smell smoke. Went to check the front door - it's a close, there's usually someone burning toast - only to be face to face with a wall of smoke. I grabbed the wean, and darted outside, while the wife called 999. I then went back into try and get the neighbours (we've got newborns in the close) and got bloody smoke inhalation, but luckily the Polish lass with the newborn heard me and got out OK, and our neighbour on the top floor was actually trapped by the fire/smoke inhalation and the firemen had to save her. The smoke was apparently effing toxic, so if I hadn't noticed something was up - wife was in, but she's got no sense of smell - her and the wean, not to mention the upstairs neighbour, would have been fucked. Scary to think about, really. Anyhow, I avoided getting chucked in the hospital to be monitored for "smoke inhalation" and our internet has now been fixed after the fire melted the effing cables. Everyone - us, the wean, the other weans, and the neighbours dog - are all fine. But still, effing kids. Little @♢!#%&$☆ - at least you're all okay. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites