Brad252 821 Posted September 12, 2022 Could David Attenborough be involved in the state funeral coverage next week, like he was for Prince Philip's funeral? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Redrumours 862 Posted September 12, 2022 27 minutes ago, Brad252 said: Could David Attenborough be involved in the state funeral coverage next week, like he was for Prince Philip's funeral? They should give Noddy Holder and Slade a chance. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Grim Up North 3,770 Posted September 12, 2022 Elton John will be rewriting Sweet Caroline as Sweet Elizabeth - woah oh oh Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Old Crem 3,628 Posted September 14, 2022 He is looking well for his age on the BBC coverage of the Queen’s funeral procession right now. But at his age and status he really should be a deathlist regular from now on. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
YouOnlyDieOnce 89 Posted September 18, 2022 I can't help thinking that this great man will have more DL entries than anybody else, due to the many.more years (hopefully) that he has left. If anybody else deserves a ceremonial funeral, nobody is more fitting. What this man has done, is nothing short of remarkable. In my humble opinion he's the greatest naturalist to ever walk the Earth, move over Charles Darwin! I did shed a tear for QE2, but I'll be a blubbering wreck when Sir David leaves us. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Yama 57 Posted September 19, 2022 On 12/09/2022 at 22:10, Brad252 said: Could David Attenborough be involved in the state funeral coverage next week, like he was for Prince Philip's funeral? He'll be attending the funeral in person apparently. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Paul Bearer 6,130 Posted September 19, 2022 11 hours ago, YouOnlyDieOnce said: I did shed a tear for QE2, but I'll be a blubbering wreck when Sir David leaves us. Are you Iain in disguise? 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Old Crem 3,628 Posted September 19, 2022 I didn’t see him at the funeral. Was that accurate? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Yama 57 Posted September 27, 2022 BBC site said he was going, they're usually pretty reliable. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ulitzer95 12,842 Posted September 27, 2022 He was invited and reported to be going, including by the BBC, but to my knowledge didn't attend. Attenborough and the Queen were very good friends and he sounded heartbroken when he was speaking about her on radio after she died. As to why he didn't attend... I have no idea. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
msc 18,534 Posted September 27, 2022 He was on the BBC talking about her on the day of the funeral (voice only) but it may have been pre-recorded. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JR976evil 909 Posted September 27, 2022 On 18/09/2022 at 21:38, YouOnlyDieOnce said: I can't help thinking that this great man will have more DL entries than anybody else, due to the many.more years (hopefully) that he has left. If anybody else deserves a ceremonial funeral, nobody is more fitting. What this man has done, is nothing short of remarkable. In my humble opinion he's the greatest naturalist to ever walk the Earth, move over Charles Darwin! I did shed a tear for QE2, but I'll be a blubbering wreck when Sir David leaves us. I never realised he liked going au naturel 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sean 6,360 Posted November 18, 2022 https://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/uk/climate-protester-arrested-over-approaching-sir-david-attenborough-at-restaurant-42155798.html : Approached by an eco-loon at a restaurant resulting in her arrest. The woman arrested claims she just tried to give Sir David a letter. Likely recollection of events. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Insane 354 Posted November 20, 2022 I’m honestly not sure if the committee should drop Sir David on one hand he seems great and on the other hand 96 seems like the magic number where older folks seem to die suddenly 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
YoungWillz 21,178 Posted March 10, 2023 BBC decide not to broadcast an episode of Wild Isles for fear of a Tory backlash on rewilding: https://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/breaking-bbc-decide-not-broadcast-29420898 Now let's be honest. This wouldn't have anything to do with Boris' mate being in charge of the BBC now, would it? Of course it would. The Beeb's horrible lurch to programming what might be acceptable to the right wing of the Tory Party is probably a direct result of this. Speak truth to power? Ah, fuck it, I'm just off the phone to Mark Francois and he says no. Free to go back on topic now... 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sir Creep 7,071 Posted March 10, 2023 On 19/11/2022 at 20:02, Insane said: I’m honestly not sure if the committee should drop Sir David on one hand he seems great and on the other hand 96 seems like the magic number where older folks seem to die suddenly They’ve wasted a space for years now on the OBVIOUSLY physically fit Dick Van Dyke. Now they’re committed. I presume the same for Sir David. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bibliogryphon 9,639 Posted March 10, 2023 17 minutes ago, YoungWillz said: BBC decide not to broadcast an episode of Wild Isles for fear of a Tory backlash on rewilding: https://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/breaking-bbc-decide-not-broadcast-29420898 Now let's be honest. This wouldn't have anything to do with Boris' mate being in charge of the BBC now, would it? Of course it would. The Beeb's horrible lurch to programming what might be acceptable to the right wing of the Tory Party is probably a direct result of this. Speak truth to power? Ah, fuck it, I'm just off the phone to Mark Francois and he says no. Free to go back on topic now... Apparently the episode was only ever intended to be on iplayer which is still will be. It has been sponsored by WWF & Greenpeace so might not meet editorial requirements for TV broadcast anyway However the fact that everyone's first thought is that those Tory biased fuckers at the BBC have got in the way goes a long way to showing what the problem is 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
time 8,672 Posted March 10, 2023 21 minutes ago, Bibliogryphon said: Apparently the episode was only ever intended to be on iplayer which is still will be. It has been sponsored by WWF & Greenpeace so might not meet editorial requirements for TV broadcast anyway However the fact that everyone's first thought is that those Tory biased fuckers at the BBC have got in the way goes a long way to showing what the problem is According to the Guardian, the lack of broadcast of the sixth episode has angered programme makers, which it identifies as Silverback Films; reference to their website finds the series described thus: Wild Isles is a major new five-part natural history series from Silverback Films that aims to do for the wildlife of Britain and Ireland what the ‘Planet’ series have done for the wildlife of the world. The first episode will air on BBC One and iPlayer at 7pm on Sunday 12th March. No mention of a sixth episode. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Toast 16,231 Posted March 22, 2023 He sounds awful here. 3 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ThereWillBeDeaths7 753 Posted March 22, 2023 Sadly even the more healthy looking nonagenarians eventually decline. Just look at Christophers Lee & Plummer, who were multiple years younger than Attenborough is now when they died quite suddenly, or Dick van Dyke who, although it looks like he'll recuperate from his car crash, could just as easily have sustained injuries far worse. Most people don't live to such a high age and those who do mostly don't age as well as Sir David has up to this point. While I do agree his voice sounds weaker than before and it is sad to see him decline, he is almost 97 and still doing the work he loves which in my opinion is a great way of living your retirement. If he survives the year (which is an if at this point, he is 97 after all) I'd say he is a must for the DL24. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lafaucheuse 4,073 Posted March 22, 2023 Am i the only one Who feels like he sounds and look good ? He sounds old but he IS old. I don’t think he’s particularly frail 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DoorSlammer 566 Posted March 22, 2023 No, I think the same. Physically he still looks to be in great shape for his age and he sounds better at the end of the video. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TheKeysOfMarinus 392 Posted March 22, 2023 He sounds fine to me, and looks great. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Old Crem 3,628 Posted May 5, 2023 On BBC1 this evening - looks pretty well. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Windsor 2,235 Posted May 5, 2023 1 minute ago, The Old Crem said: On BBC1 this evening - looks pretty well. Awfully doddery though. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
