Jump to content
Windsor

Deathlist On The Net

Recommended Posts

Deathers, not hard exactly.

 

An 'under ten' pool would do it...

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

As a general rule of thumb I'd say the media coverage DL gets is indicative of the fact that this place still offends people but the world and his dog are slowly getting more tolerant and accepting of dead pooling.

 

Quite a few people in my office have cheery conversations these days asking whether I "had" Desmond Carrington etc.

 

We'd have to step it up if we really wanted to offend folks

 

Some people seem to find it more offensive if money is involved.

 

 

 

Aye, now funny you should mention that because I've always thought the idea of Cash for Cadavours a little unsavory. Never enterned myself; has anyone else hereabouts?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Deathers, not hard exactly.

 

An 'under ten' pool would do it...

 

Aye, or one based on rough sleepers visible to various CCTV cameras across the UK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Deathers, not hard exactly.

 

An 'under ten' pool would do it...

Be fecking hard to get a hit, most under tens have done jack shit in their life.

 

Bloody lazy shites

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Deathers, not hard exactly.

 

An 'under ten' pool would do it...

Be fecking hard to get a hit, most under tens have done jack shit in their life.

 

Bloody lazy shites

 

 

Depends on the rules, if you accept famous for being ill under tens who've been whored out by their fame-hungry parents in a few charity events you'd get a shit-tonne of hits.

 

Although anybody who even jokingly starts that kind of pool should be permanently banned from the site for being a cunt..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I see the Daily Star are covering this site again after Rockefeller's demise. No need to link the article.   

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, YoungWillz said:

I see the Daily Star are covering this site again after Rockefeller's demise. No need to link the article.   

 

I think there is.  I just love the publicity.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
37 minutes ago, Lord Fellatio Nelson said:

I kinda like the notion that this is a 'chilling' website. :lol:

 

 

I come here to chill. B)

  • Like 12

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If we count as chilling how the hell do you describe corners of the dark web?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Spade_Cooley said:

Deathlist and chill

 

Don't, Cat might come back.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not been on Stormfront for a while (since I had Rochus Misch in my team) and lo and beheiled they have a, short, thread on us this year. https://www.stormfront.org/forum/t1193567/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, Deathray said:

 

Archive version so you don't have to visit stormfront http://archive.is/GGkUe

First mentioned DeathList entry is David Rockefeller. Nr. 1 on the wishlist is George Soros... as one could have expected.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Notice how not one of them condemns the nature of this website, like most others who talk about us usually do. I guess it's because they can relate to being criticized by the outside, although our commonality pretty much stops right there. We're controversial but ultimately harmless, while those fuckers are messed up for real.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just imagine all the Chilean CNN watchers whose first sight of Tony Booth is via his DL front page picture.

  • Haha 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Think he made a joke about not wanting to be Valerie Harper.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Drewsky1211 said:

Anyone else notice how they just almost entirely copy-pasted their previous mention of us?

Sure did, goes to show their laziness on these type of sites.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"The rule that candidates must be famous enough to be reported by UK media is abhorrent when compared with media coverage of deaths that result from everyday tragic circumstances."- https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/weird-news/670567/Celebrity-deaths-2017-website-predictions-Death-List-Hugh-Hefner-Ian-Brady-Bruce-Forsyth

:lol::lol::lol:

Who wrote this bullshit?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, FixedBusiness said:

Sure did, goes to show their laziness on these type of sites.

I believe that your considered response to the said article has actually made the rest of us look like a bunch of fucking idiots, or summat.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×

Important Information

Your use of this forum is subject to our Terms of Use